Wednesday, 18 January 2012

YOU’S LOT ON THE INTERNET! – YES HE MEANS YOU

According to recently published internet usage statistics this recent sweeping generalisation by Hugh Keevins on the Clyde “Super” Scoreboard encompasses 82% of the population. This frustrated shriek sounded like the caretaker of an alleged haunted hotel who had just been un-masked on Scooby Doo. There is an element of life imitating fiction in this analogy as in truth if it wasn’t for you pesky kids on the internet they would be getting away with it too.

It appears to be a common held opinion amongst many of the hacks, particularly those on the airwaves that people in the habit of contributing to the world of online social media do not hold views worthy of consideration and are to be condescended. These are some of the self same people who were gladly tolerated at supporter’s functions and the like in the late eighties; but then I suppose there were five books to sell and the customer is always right. There was an add on to one such rebuke on a recent show about how these people on the internet have caused terrible situations that the police are having to deal with. 




There is a small percentage of unfathomable people who use the internet to peddle abuse and cause harm to others, these people have existed in every generation and every walk of life. The use of the internet is now predominantly their preferred tool of communicating their message of hate and abuse. These are the same collection of people who in the past would send poison pen letters, heavy breathers down the phone line or make hoax calls to the emergency services. That these people now use the internet instead should not cloud people’s judgement on the other 81% of the population who use it without crime.

It fits the old medias agenda to portray a different story and make those unfamiliar with the online community suspicious and wary of it and make those who actually contribute to it or follow it feel like a bungling extremist. I believe there are two main reasons for this; the realisation that the established old media is in decline and the awareness that those pesky people on the internet are actually better informed than them. Both of the reasons at their source have the underlying fear that there is a shift in power.

The global decline of the newspaper industry is well documented, it stands to reason that a drop in sales leads to a drop in the amount it can command for its advertising and whilst titles have online versions, the print pound is more valuable than the digital penny. Burdened with large fixed costs they are vulnerable to the downturn in sales as people find alternative ways of accessing their news. Some commentators have studied the trend in falling sales through the world and predict a timeline for the extinction of Newspapers across the continents with the UK being one of the first to fall in 2019. This information was from the internet so it must be a misinformed extremist view though – right?



Putting the Global decline aside and concentrating on the sport pages of our own Daily / Sunday papers it is not hard to see why people have turned away from the old media. In the good old days before the pesky internet you had limited choices; you bought the paper in the morning, you bought the Celtic view once a week and you listened to BBC Scotland or Radio Clyde. On the morning Maurice Johnstone signed for Celtic in 1989 I remember being in the kitchen having breakfast when it came on Clyde Sport, the news of him not signing for Celtic (and everyone remembers where they were) was discovered by walking into a newsagents and seeing the front page of a tabloid. The days of the media breaking stories in this way no longer exists for the majority of people. Tuesday’s signing of Jaroslaw Fojut was broken by Celtic via a twiiter link to its website and quickly followed up by online contributors providing career background stats and opinion on his attributes. Within 10 minutes of the signing being announced there was nothing left to find out, rendering the purchase of a paper or listening to the radio sports desks redundant. By following a small number of people in the Celtic Twitter Family you have access to the Celtic news and views immediately.

The power previously held by the old sports media in this country was immense, the sports editors could set the agenda or agendas of others and the common man in the street had no other source to dispute the validity of the piece – a hole eventually plugged by fanzines like Not the View. Coupled with this if you had a platform on the airwaves to reinforce the agenda then the stranglehold on the sports news was complete. Think for a second about how the current Rangers Tax Case story would have been massaged and manipulated if there was no other form of media. Stories of potential global brand moonbeams, super casinos and whiz kids with wealth off the scale would have a gullible and accepting audience whilst the severity of the tax case would be dismissed with reports of negotiations going on with the top brass in the HMRC in London. Without the quality of online contributions from unpaid yet vastly more informed individuals the tax case would have been allowed to creep up with the similar type of silence normally only reserved for a Celtic goal in a David Begg Commentary.   

The acknowledgement that the material produced on the internet via blogs like the Rangerstaxcase is well informed and erudite, is hard to reconcile for the older generation of the media who have had a cartel on dictating the sports agenda for decades. The claim by some that they have never viewed that particular blog is hard to believe as equipping yourself with as much knowledge on a subject that is the biggest story in decades is surely a competence, unless of course you don’t want or are not allowed to demonstrate your knowledge to a wider audience. You can hear the discomfort on a nightly basis on Radio Clyde (if you so wish) as reasoned people ask reasonable questions and make reasoned points signifying they know more than has been or will ever be reported.

The attempt to set the agenda is already underway by the old media who have one eye on the worst case scenario as you will no doubt be familiar with the “Celtic need Rangers” Mantra or the “Scottish football would implode” Mantra. In the event of a Newco Rangers emerging in the future they are starting the campaign to rip up the SPL statutes and allow them to be lifted over the turnstyle. Its all about self preservation and why not? the demise or decline of the club who provides your publication with the majority of your readership is obviously going to hit your figures hard, perhaps even a mortal blow. 

But of course those pesky folk on the internet are going to keep meddling and stop them getting away with it - and they know way too much.   








4 comments:

  1. Excellent article. Well informed and absolutely spot on.

    As I mentioned on twitter, the role of the MSM is to propagandise, distract, assimilate and subjugate the masses. You can't have the masses ask too many questions, therefore you propagate a world view of your making. Politicians, big business and the MSM have done it for all time. Caesar was brilliant at it. The role of the masses, in turn, is to live in a constant state of fear and obedience (brilliantly articulated by Marilyn Manson - you turn on the tv and they have you living in fear of just having spots...cue multitude of spot creams). There is no such thing as a free press. Governments have always had the power to stop any story running, should they so choose, but hey, we live in a democracy so you have to let a lot of it through, except the real meat and bones. Governments used to be able to tell the media what stories they could run and what line they could peddle. Business has always dictated government policy so politicians dined at the table of the rich and powerful. As the MSM has become more and more powerful, it is they who have politicians eating out of their palms and they are just as capable of destroy any big business. See Ratners...

    Along comes the internet, and everything is ok for about 15 years. You get piracy and porn but there is nothing that really harms those in positions of power. Then, BOOM, social media...and things have never been worse for politicians, businesses, or the MSM. None of them know what or how to deal with it.

    Sure, you can try and censor it, but it will get out some way or another (Wikileaks, Anonymous, the brilliant RTC, et al). The thing is the hackers and truth seekers will always be a step ahead of those in power. It is this fear that politicians, business and the MSM live with daily, because they know that as soon as it gets out there, it is a virus that spreads across the globe (think HMRC, Vodafone and Goldmann Sachs and the clampdown on tax dodgers ordered by government - a government who are only doing so because of public demand). There is nothing they can do about it. They try to go into damage control, spinning more lies and as soon as it is out of their mouths those lies are being exposed (yes Mr Whyte, especially you). Believe me, this is the real reason behing SOPA in the US. Not to stop pirates but to censor a really free press that they don't know how to control. They have lost the power. Governments have and continue to be brought down by the power of new media, and I foresee it for some time to come. This is the old guard in its death throes and they are going through the stages of death. Traynor, Keevins, et al are experiencing denial and anger and soon they will have to accept it.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thats a blog there in itself! The points you make are spot on thanks for contributing to the debate.

      Delete
  2. this is so tru.the media,written & otherwise are terrified of the powershift that is on the horizen.i listened to keevens and others of that ilk........they deny looking at the internet.they wouldnt have said to much about the tax situation with r/////s all they do is hide behind libel and slander laws,whereas any reporter worth his salt would find a way to let the punters know there was a big story in the offing.they just want to stay in the loop and get given (exclusives)evry so often,from the sfa and other (sources)they should own up, put up,or shut up

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Your right of course they look at it, they would negligent not to. You only have to look at some of the "exclusives" some of them have written to know that they do read it. I take your point on a reporter worth his salt really blaizing the trail but I think wings have been clipped, agendas have been set and no-one wants to alienate the rangers "customers"

      Delete